May 31, 2006

Ich Bin Ein Binladner

Der Spiegle is reporting that German intelligence forces recently thwarted suicide attacks in Iraq by three German women.

In the article, reporter Matthias Gebauer admits albeit shamefully that ~

"There have been several such cases in the past and German security officials have long been worried that Islamic militants are increasingly recruiting young Muslims with German passports for suicide attacks...[sic]"

Mentioning that one of the women was a convert to Islam, we are left to wonder if these were in fact young Muslim immigrants with German passports refusing to assimilate into German culture and society or if they were in fact something other than first generation Germans. The article seems in fact to allude to the later.

Instead of laying the blame on Islamic militants for recruting gullible Germans, perhaps the Germans need to take time and reflect and perhaps ask themselves how their country has in recent years become such a fertile ground for recrudescent Islamic extremism and fundamentalism.

Today's Germany is more of a cult rather than a nation with it's citizens suffering the psychosis of self-hatred perpetuated by the endless indoctrination constantly reminding Germans of he dark side of Nationalism. With a sense of guilt naturally following their aggression, Is it really any wonder that so many Germans have been driven to the other end of the spectrum?

And so, like a moth to a flame, Germans have blindly embraced the destructive ideology of multiculturalism (de-nationalism) and socialism to their own demise.

Faced now with a determined adversary possessing an unflagging conscience and emboldened by a sense of a moral superiority, the future of Germany looks dhim.


May 25, 2006

Defiance of the Janus Cartel

Befuddled by Pakistan's intransigency with regards to the questioning of Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan concerning his transfer to Iran of nuclear technology and the equipment needed to contruct a nuclear weapon, the U. S. House of Representatives - Subcommittee on International Terrorism and Nonproliferation has suddenly called for an open hearing to be held on the 25th of May at 2pm.

It's anyone's guess what will become of the meeting and strangely there seems to be not even the slightest mention of it in the United States' media neither is there any mention of Pakistan's recent appointment of Anwar Ali as the new Chairman of Pakistan's Atomic Energy Commission. Anwar Ali was tied to nuclear proliferation in the 1980's, and along with his cronies Dr. AQ Khan and General Aslam Beg is an Islamist and card-carrying member of the anti-American contingent who share a dream of a nuclearizing the Middle East.

In any event, regardless of the outcome of the meeting in Washington, Pakistan's government remains steadfastly defiant.

“We have repeatedly said that whatever information is required, questions can be forwarded to the government of Pakistan. We would get the answer, we would do investigation and we would transmit this information,” she said. “(But) there is no question of direct access.”

With contemptuous and defiant statements like this, it makes it very hard to believe that Dr. AQ Khan's transfers of nuclear weapon technology and equipment took place without the approval and sanction of the Pakistani government. Seriously, considering the seriousness of the matter and the fact that the world is on the very verge of nuclear blackmail from a country who has repeatably threatened to use nuclear weapons and "wipe Israel of the map", on what conceivable basis would a supposed ally of the United States have to object?

It's deja vu all over again as the world powers urgently meet in London and discuss how to appease an obstreperous Iran. Pakistan and Iran have their own meeting.

Lets hope the world powers don't offer up Czechoslovakia again this time. Chances are they will be forced to surrender Israel instead anyway.


May 23, 2006

Pakistani Perfidy and The Wrath of Khan

If it wasn't for the endless extolling of Pakistan and General Pervez Musharraf as our" staunchest ally in the war on terror" by our nation's leaders and the endless mind-numbing praise in our nation's media, one might be led to think of Pakistan as our adversary in the War on Terror based on their actions. The reality is that our dear friends the Pakistanis have and continue to betray us.

Pakistan's military dictatorship led by General Pervez Musharraf continues to maintain a facade of friendship with the United States reaping the rewards of their one-sided friendship all the while impeding and directly working against our overall efforts in the war on terrorism and nuclear proliferation. Doesn't sound very friendly now does it?

As the world now faces the imminent threat of nuclear blackmail from Iran, the one man who can answer the questions the world seeks and help to lift the veil of secrecy concerning Iran's progress on developing their nuclear weapon is Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan.

Pakistan's official response has been to deny all access to Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan citing Pakistan's national security concerns. Our sources now indicate that Dr. AQ Khan who is 71 years old and has failing health has been moved into a "safe house" and provided with additional security with no one being allowed access.

Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan authorized by General Mirza Aslam Beg supplied the much needed nuclear technology and equipment for Iran to construct their own nuclear weapon.

Last year, General Mirza Aslam Beg explained in chilling detail at how he sees a nuclear weapon equipped Iran as providing for a balance of power in the Middle East.

"...Nuclear deterrence between Iran and Israel has crossed the psychological barrier. Nuclear deterrence between South and North Korea has already been established.... Therefore, the nuclear fault line of the 21st century, now extends from Israel to Iran, Pakistan to India and South Korea to North Korea, while the strategic balance is held by the United States and Europe on one side and Russia and China on the other..."

Both Dr. Abdul Kadeer Khan and General Mirza Aslam Beg are no friends of Israel or the United States. Only last week in a startling revelation former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto revealed that General Beg and and the Director General of Pakistan's intelligence agency sought to attack the United States in support of Osama Bin Laden.

Also last week, Iran sought further advise from Pakistan regarding heading off an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. General Beg advised Iran to make it clear that any attack on Iran nuclear facilities will result in a complete attack on Israel.

Asked how soon Iran might have nuclear weapons, General Beg stated that he is sure "Iran has already had enough time to develop them".

Our sources have indicated that by next month Iran will have constructed five nuclear weapons and will be conducting an underground test to demonstrate their achievement.


May 18, 2006

Outfoxing America

Just over a year ago I wrote a post entitled Al Qaeda Tours and Travel, spelling out in clear painful detail exactly how Al Qaeda and other Muslim fundamamentalist groups get their foot soldiers into the United States. If you have not read it, I urge you to. You might be surprised to find out that a year later, it is business as usual, with the pace quickening and even more illegal invaders moving in through America's porous land borders.

Who is providing jobs for these individuals and financing them once they arrive in the United States. This investigative report dated 17 May 2006 entitled "Kingdom of the Illegals" might shed some more light on the picture.

Expect to read more details here in the near future as we attempt to track an upcoming movement of two Bangladeshis to the United States.

What I find disturbing, and so should you, it that it would take the issue of illegal immigration rather than the issue of national security to convince many Americans that our unsecured borders presented a problem. What many Americans fail to realize is just how serious the problem is and how Al Qaeda and their supporters have been actively infiltrating our borders since 2001.

America does not have a illegal immigration problem, it has a national security problem and a serious one to boot.


May 15, 2006

A Gift From Allah

"Those who do business with terror will do no business with the United States, or anywhere else the United States can reach"

"Hamas is an extremist group that calls for the total destruction of the State of Israel. It is one of the deadliest terrorist organizations in the world today."

Like many, I am completely shocked beyond disbelief at how an American president can have the audacity to use taxpayer money to fund a group that the United States and others have labeled a terrorist organization. It is even more disturbing when American diplomats admit that the "humanitarian aid" will be used to pay some of the salaries of Palestinian government officials.

Like many though I'm left with a nagging question... "Why?"

Why are we providing any money to a group commited to our own destruction and the destruction of Israel? Are we so delusional that we somehow believe that dumping more money into this 'blackhole of hatred' we can buy goodwill or peace?

What many in the West including the United States fail to understand is that no amount of "humanitarian aid" will ever foster any good will.

The reason why it will never foster any good will requires a deep understanding of the Muslim psyche.

For the Muslims, "humanitarian aid" is never attributed to be from the United States or from Europe, it is in essense a gift from Allah. It is not the West who ultimately provides for this assistance, it is Allah who ultimately provides.

Muslims sincerely believe that the West is compelled to pay, and that their acquiescence is seen in many respects as their de facto submission to the will of Allah. The fact that America would initially resist in providing "humanitarian aid" and then grudgingly 'give in' sends a a mixed message to many Americans, but it sends a very clear message to the Muslim world.

The message is that America and the infidels "know their place".

As your taxpayer dollars are paid to fund these killers and their ilk, perhaps you can also ask yourself "Why?"


May 13, 2006

Rub and a Tug

Both Malaysia and Singapore have numerous so-called health centers in almost every shopping center and in almost all hotels. It is not just a massage that the majority of the places have on offer but in addition to your massage for an extra charge you can get a hetrosexual hand job offered by a Juicy Fruit chewing young girl.

In Singapore almost every shopping center has at least one of these so-called "health centers" all designed exclusively to relieve the paying customer of those nagging erections you get while shopping for a pair of Reeboks.

Unfortunately, for the muslim man in Malaysia and Singapore, getting a massage and/or a "rub and a tug" from a female masseur at one of these establishments is something considered "haram" in Islam. Many of the hotels and shopping centers that have massage centers are required to have a sign posted inside informing their potential muslim customers that getting a massage from a women is absolutely off limits. Of course getting a massage from another man is considered perfectly okay.

Something that seems to be growing in popularity here in recent years for the muslim male is the establishment of massage centers designed for men only with young male masseurs offering a variety of sevices including a so-called traditional Malay massage called "urut tenaga batin" or a "manhood massage". Of course the special "manhood massage" costs a lot more than the traditional Malay massage.

Sadly, this Singaporean got a lot more than he bargained for when he got his traditional "urut batin" massage. And to answer his question, the answer is 'yes'.


May 11, 2006

Hu is watching Yu

"In the ramifications of party doctrine she had not the faintest interest. Whenever he began to talk of the principles of Ingsoc, doublethink, the mutability of the past, and the denial of objective reality, and to use Newspeak words, she became bored and confused and said that she never paid any attention to that kind of thing. One knew that it was all rubbish, so why let oneself be worried by it? She knew when to cheer and when to boo, and that was all one needed."

All in the interest of "Letting the Winds of a Civilized Internet Blow", it could be said that perhaps the Chinese in China and Singapore must really enjoy getting it up the yingyang considering that the majority would not resist their government's efforts inducing them to spy on each other.

While this might be something we have come to expect from China where one might have to forfeit a kidney for listening to the wrong radio station, it is something that many of us thought Singapore was starting to rise above. In Singapore you get to keep your kidney and just forfeit your wallet instead.

The leadership of Singapore like to refer to their form of government by using the the euphemism "asian-style democracy". However, the idea of a government restricting freedom of speech and inducing or promoting it's citizens to spy on each other is not representative of a free democratic society respectful of human rights, rather it is the staple of an authoritative and at times totalitarian regime who is unwilling to embrace the principles of freedom or liberty.

Having failed to make the transition to a free democracy, the nation-state of Singapore it would seem has become nothing more than the epitome of the Kafkaesque nightmare.

And so as Hu watches Yu and Singapore continues to clamp down on freedom, we're left to ask ourselves whatever happened to "letting one thousand flowers bloom"?


May 5, 2006

The Bishop's Nose

Yesterday was a long day for me. I finished my work quite late and decided to go pick up a pirated DVD copy of "Flight 93" and then on the way back stopped by the KFC outlet.

I don't really visit KFC here that often, but when I do it is always the same order. Three pieces of chicken (all breasts). The girl behind the counter looked at me for a moment, smiled and then picked out three pieces of breast meat and plonked them in the box. The whole thing got me thinking.

You see, Asians for the most part and the Chinese in particular can't stand the white meat of a chicken and they are always too happy to see some "guailo" come in and order the white meat. Unlike the West where if you ordered "all white meat" you would end up paying extra, here you get it with no extra charge. I suppose if you wanted you could go in and order a twentyone piece KFC big barrel o' breasts with no extra charge.

If it was just thighs and legs that the Chinese prefered I could readily understand that. Over the years though, what I have never been able to comprehend however is the Chinese affinity for eating "chicken ass".

In Malaysia and Singapore "chicken ass" goes by the polite euphemism "Bishop's Nose", and many of the locals go absolutely gaga over it.

When McDonald's first introduced their new sandwich over here in Asia last year they advertised it as containing "100% white chicken meat patties" and since then they have quietly dropped the 100% white chicken part.

Has not happened yet, but I'm still waiting for KFC to introduce the "Bucket o' Ass" here in Asia and McDonald's to introduce a new chicken sandwich made with 100% chicken ass. I think they might end up being big sellers.


May 4, 2006

Al Qaeda's Symbol of Hope

In response to the Zacarias Moussaoui verdict, Peggy Noonan noted that the death penalty has meaning other than vengeance. I couldn't agree more, but I would like to add my perspective from here.

What we see in the Moussaoui verdict is not a higher compassion for the sanctity of human life, but a lack of resolve on the part of the American people in ultimately winning the war that we faced with. In hindsight, Moussaoui should have never been tried in a civilian court, but rather by a military tribunal.

By continuing to criminalize acts of war and terrorism by civilian courts instead of military tribunals is perhaps painfully representative of the fact that the majority of Americans have still not come to the realization that that we are "in fact" in the midst of a war. Of course it does no help to continuously use the ambiguous politically correct euphemism "War on Terror" instead of actually saying who we are at war against.

Can anyone imagine the ludicrousness of Hitler or one of his officers being tried in a civilian court? How about Osama Bin Laden or even Zacarias Moussaoui for that matter?

Much worse than a martyr, Moussaoui now becomes a living inspiration, a symbol of hope, to both Al Qaeda and their sympathizers who wish nothing other than to see Moussaoui's prediction that eventually President Bush will be forced to pardon him. Alive and imprisoned, Moussaoui maintains now a symbiotic relationship with Al Qaeda and their recruiting efforts around the globe.

We can now expect nothing other than Al Qaeda's new recruits inspired by America's lack of resolve and Moussaoui's predictions to go on a hostage taking spree of Americans in Iraq and elsewhere around the globe in the hopes of forcing Moussaoui's release in an exchange of prisoners.

How many videos will we have to watch on Al Jazeera of American hostages now begging for their lives unless Moussaoui is released?

And how many of those hostages will suffer the ultimate penalty that Moussaoui should have paid?


Creative Commons License